🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a lower court's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and upsetting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's action. She stated that it disrespected the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The ruling comes amid a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic officials decried the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House leader stated the court had once again shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.